Anton Shepp vs Philip Hjorth Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 11 Jun at 03:51 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Shepp vs P. Hjorth

NZL
1
Win
Played
0
Win

DEN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Shepp 1 - 0 Hjorth
They have played 2 sets in total, with Anton Shepp winning 2 and Philip Hjorth winning 0. The last match between Anton Shepp and Philip Hjorth was at the M25 Varnamo, 11-06-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Anton Shepp getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Shepp | 1 |
| Hjorth | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Varnamo(06-11-25)
A. Shepp vs P. Hjorth H2H Profile
A. Shepp vs P. Hjorth Match Preview:
- Shepp has a slight advantage in second serve points, capturing 45.1% compared to Hjorth's 41.44%. Could this edge impact the match outcome?
- Hjorth excels in return games, winning 47.54% on opponents' second serves versus Shepp's 31.82%. A strong return game could be pivotal.
- For first serve returns, Shepp narrowly outperforms Hjorth, winning 28.78% of points compared to Hjorth's 27.54%.
- In breakpoints, Hjorth secures 53.29% under pressure, slightly better than Shepp's 50% save rate.
- Shepp has shown superior overall match success over the past year with a win rate of 62.5%, unlike Hjorth's 47.27%.
- Shepp exhibits exceptional performance on clay, winning 100% of matches, whereas Hjorth’s best surface is hard courts with a win rate of 59%.
- Shepp has been playing and winning more consistently at Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K level compared to Hjorth.
- On average, Shepp has faced more competitive opponents with a higher ranking (134.5) than Hjorth (371.96).
- In matches leading to a deciding set, Shepp dominates with a win percentage of 67%, while Hjorth manages only 22%.
- Both players are nearly equal in breakpoint conversions, with Shepp at 33.33% and Hjorth at 33.67%.
Editorial Prediction (June 11, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the recent form and overall performance of both players provides some insightful indicators. Shepp’s higher success rate in second serve points may offer an advantage in maintaining service games, potentially affecting the match's momentum.
Hjorth's strong return game might set the stage for breaking Shepp's serve more frequently, balancing the scales between their competitive strengths. This aspect will be crucial and could determine the match’s outcome.
Overall match records suggest Shepp brings a better form and consistency into this contest, which is enhanced by facing stronger opponents on average. Unlike Hjorth, Shepp appears more comfortable going the distance, excelling in deciding sets, which frequently outlines a player’s mental fortitude.
Considering these elements, Shepp seems primed as the favorite for the upcoming match, given their well-rounded strengths and positive historical performance trends.
Anton Shepp vs Philip Hjorth Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Shepp vs P. Hjorth H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:10:37 | Average Match Time | 1:10:37 |
| 72% (36/50) | 1st Serve % | 54% (27/50) |
| 72% (26/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 41% (11/27) |
| 57% (8/14) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (11/23) |
| 45% (5/11) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/6) |
| 56% (28/50) | Return Points Win % | 32% (16/50) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Shepp Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 7-5 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 7-6(3) | ||
Q3 | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-4 6-0 | ||
R2 | L | 6-4 3-6 6-1 | ||
P. Hjorth Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-2 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-0 | ||
R1 | L | 3-6 6-2 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 6-7(2) 6-3 7-6(6) | ||
R1 | L | 2-6 6-4 7-6(3) | ||

A. Shepp vs P. Hjorth Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63.89% (46/26) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.78% (65/63) |
| 63.47% (106/61) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.98% (156/133) |
| 55.44% (902/725) | Games Win/Loss | 52.51% (1371/1240) |
| 63.33% (38/22) | Hard Win/Loss | 58.57% (41/29) |
| 66.67% (8/4) | Clay Win/Loss | 44.00% (22/28) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 25.00% (2/6) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 192 | Aces Total | 131 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 95 | Total Double Faults | 251 |
| 1:8:28 | Average Match Time | 1:1:42 |
| 250.68 | Average Opponent Rank | 299.43 |
| 68% (2073/3063) | 1st Serve % | 65% (3355/5131) |
| 69% (1431/2073) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (2191/3355) |
| 50% (493/990) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (843/1776) |
| 37% (133/358) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (210/501) |
| 40% (1273/3207) | Return Points Win % | 40% (2027/5099) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 64.79% (46/25) | Futures W/L | 51.59% (65/61) |
| 64% (46/72) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (65/125) |
| 80% (8/10) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 65% (13/20) |
| 39% (9/23) | Deciding Set Win % | 28% (10/36) |
| 90% (48/43) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 75% (80/60) |
| 10% (48/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 25% (80/20) |
| 13% (24/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (48/5) |